Fieldwork in the Atacama Desert, Chile

Friday, 8 June 2018

Scientifically accurate, non clickbait title: NASA finds organic matter on Mars which is probably not evidence of life but there's a very slim chance it could be

Warning – angry rant, lots of swears

So after the weeks of hype build-up NASA released their latest big findings from the Curiosity Rover last night. Sensationalist clickbait tweets and headlines from the scientific media seem to tell us that we’ve finally got direct evidence of life on Mars:

‘Scientists for the first time have confidently identified on Mars a collection of carbon molecules used and produced by living organisms’ @nytimes

‘Mars has complex organic material that may be from ancient life’ @newscientist

 ‘NASA finds ‘building blocks of life’ in 3 billion-year-old lakebed on Mars….is there finally proof of alien life on the red planet’ The Sun

 And that bastion of great science reporting The Express goes full on with ‘Life on Mars: NASA finds ‘HOLY GRAIL’ in rover search for ALIEN LIFE’  and ‘Nasa UNCOVERS evidence of LIFE on Mars in latest SHOCK revelations’- actually fucking capitalising the bollocks bits, seriously?!?!?

Really,?!? FUCKING REALLY?!?!?

Now, there’s nothing wrong with the articles themselves but as has been shown time and time again plenty of people don’t actually read past the headlines and a quick check of the comments show that we now have people believing NASA has announced finding life on Mars (although if you can be bothered to comment why not read the full article)… Unfortunately rather than being interested in good science communication it appears, yet again, that the media is only interested in getting website traffic so more people see some fucking annoying pop-up of a new Volvo or something.

If you’ve actually read this far you won't be surprised to learn that the truth is nowhere near as exciting as the headlines suggest. Basically NASA has found exactly what it has expected, but failed, to find since the Viking missions in the 1970’s, organic macromolecular material. While this could have a biological origin, there is NO evidence for this! Organic material just like this is produced abiotically (without life) throughout the universe. We find very similar molecules in meteorites that have fallen to Earth and the impact of meteorites along with comets and interplanetary dust particles will have delivered organic matter to the Martian surface. It has been calculated that 100-300 metric tons of organic matter is delivered to the Martian surface in this way EACH YEAR. There are also ways in which the organic matter could have been produced on Mars itself through hydrothermal or igneous processes. While we cannot rule out the possibility that these molecules are evidence of ancient life that lived in the lake these sediments were deposited in this is the least likely source, we KNOW the other processes would have happened, we have NO EVIDENCE of life.

What I think is the most interesting thing here, and one that is not really touched on in the paper (presumably because it’s in Science so they didn’t have the page space) is WHY we have detected these molecules now? There have been hints of organic matter in previous samples from the Sheepbed mudstone further up the formation, but these were low responses and all simple chlorinated molecules, these more complex molecules have been found in the older Murray mudstones. It is suggested that these, being buried deeper, have been less exposed to the destructive effects of cosmic radiation, but over the time periods involved could a little bit less exposure really have saved them? One of the reasons we hadn’t found complex organic material up until this point was because it was destroyed during analysis. Minerals in the Martian soil (such as perchlorates) were releasing oxygen when heated and this caused the organic material to combust and be lost to analysis (this is what I work on). For these molecules to be detected now, there must either be more of them in the sediment or less of the oxidising minerals and it is interesting to think what processes could have concentrated the organic matter or removed the minerals in these units…

I’m not going to go into any more detail on the science side of things, everything I want to say revolves around some unpublished work we’ve currently got in review and I’m not supposed to discuss that kind of stuff till it’s out. Needless to say we’ll be getting it back to update it with these latest findings before it can be published.

Here’s a link to the actual paper in Science

And a nicely put together write up by someone who’s much better at these things than I am

Tuesday, 3 April 2018

The closest I will ever get to Mars - Atacama fieldwork

I've just got back from a week's fieldwork in the Atacama Desert, Chile. The part of this massive, over 100,000 square kilometer area, desert we were in is one of the driest places on Earth - only the Antarctic Dry Valleys have a lower annual precipitation.

I was participating in a field campaign organised by the HOME (Habitability of Martian Environments) project with a German-based team of astrobiologists, microbiologists and astronomers. This project focuses on the Atacama as it is the most Mars-like environment we can study first hand. Here, they test theories of how microbial life may adapt and survive to the harshest hyper-arid, high-UV and high-salinity environments, as they may have on Mars. This group has just published, to a massive media reception, a study showing that microbial life can exist in a dormant state, underground, possibly for 1000's of years, even in the driest part of the desert - blooming after rare rainfall events. Maybe this is how life adapted to the gradually drying climate on Mars billions of years ago.

The desert was amazing, the landscape really was Martian. No signs or sounds of life (except for the occasional long-distance travelling vulture) and just reddish dry, dusty rocks and sands as far as the eye could see. It really did look just like the images coming back from Gale Crater on Mars - except for the bright blue sky.

The Atacama or Mars?

We were in the desert to collect more samples to further this research and other work on hyper-arid soils and Martian analogs carried out by the many collaborators of the group. Unfortunately, it appeared as though the hyper-arid core of the desert had been a bit wet recently... Evidence of heavy rainfall and past standing bodies of water were everywhere. Even the pits, dug in previous years, that we had planned to sample from had been half infilled by water-transported debris - shifting this was to prove hard work and very time consuming.

We did think early on in the week that we had found a breakthrough to this problem of reaching the, now reburied, ancient sediments as a massively deep (45 m) hole was found, purely by accident by a team member looking for a quiet toilet spot. This looked to have been drilled as some part of recent mining activity which is all over the place in the area. As the only climber in the group I was tasked with figuring out how we could safely descend into the hole and collect samples from previously unexplored depths. Luckily there was a climbing shop in Antagofasta, the nearest town, and after a bit of language-barrier related fun (what is screwgate in Spanish anyone?) we managed to purchase everything necessary for 2 people to go down at a time - including over 250 m of various ropes and cord.

The hole, laser measurements showed it was 45 m down to the water

Practicing at camp

After a fun evening teaching the rest of the group how to put on harnesses and use a gri-gri (autoblocking belay device) to descend and self-belay I rigged up a complex system of anchors (hammered in stakes), safety lines and knotted hand lines to re-ascend with. Then descended down the hole to test the system while everyone else watched. Desert dust clogged the ropes and belay device which made abseiling down difficult and jerky, dust and small rocks fell from the poorly consolidated side walls of the narrow hole. As I got deeper it got cold quickly. I stopped at 10 m to test how easily it was to get out again and pulled myself onto the 'rope ladder' hand line I'd made to climb back up on.


The Gri-Gri was completely seized up, dust had coated the thick 10 mm rope I'd bought to be extra safe and the extra friction meant it would take both hands to haul it through the belay device, I only had one free as the other was needed to take my weight off the rope I was on and onto the handline. This made reascending, safely, by the planned means impossible, ~If I had ascended the handline I would not have been able to self-belay at the same time so if the thin handline rope had snapped I wold have fallen.

I was stuck hanging 10 m deep, with a jammed Gri-Gri in the middle of the desert....Bollocks.

After trying everything I could to free myself (short of 10 m of vertical pruscking, which might have also jammed up and left me in even more of a tangle) while the group at the top grew understandably more anxious, I had to admit I'd fucked up and shout for a pull. Tying hand and foot loops in the second rope that had been set up I held on tight as 8 of my colleagues hauled me back into the light as I self belayed up my (now-unweighted and free moving) rope in case they dropped me. As they pulled me up the ropes cut into the soft sediment sending down a hail of dirt and stones - thankfully I was wearing a helmet as some of the chunks were big enough to do some damage.

Because of these unstable side walls it was decided that, rather than modify the technique used to avoid anyone getting stuck and going again, we should abandon the (w)hole idea as it was just too unsafe. I had seen some large rocks in the side walls as I went past and if they had fallen out and hit you at depth you'd be a gonner, helmet or not. So the hole remains unexplored and the depths of the Atacama keep their secrets, for now...

The failure at the deep hole meant that the only way to sample ancient sediments would be to dig. Much of the week was therefore spent digging, with pickaxe and spade - and on the last day, through harder layers - a jackhammer, and hauling buckets. This was hard, sweaty work, especially in the heat of the midday sun and the intense afternoon winds. A far cry from my usual day-to-day activity in the climate-controlled lab. It didn't take me long to come around to the German's habit of hydrating with 'isotonic' cervezas.

Digging for Science

By the end of each day we were knackered, we worked until just before sunset so there was enough light to sort out camp and build our fire. We had earned our barbecue and passed pisco around the campfire. Camping in the middle of the desert, we slept under the stars; the Milky way was the brightest I've ever seen it, we saw Jupiter rising, shooting stars, the International Space Station and even Mars.

Our view from our sleeping bags each night

Halfway through the week we had a rest day visiting the Very Large Telescope (VLT). Located on top of a flattened mountain at around 2500 m altitude, this is one of the most powerful telescopes in the world looking at some of the clearest skies. They don't lie, it is Very Large; 4 identical telescopes (each pretty big themselves) which work together collecting light to form a 'virtual telescope' around 130 m across. Before returning to camp, we stopped off back in Antagofasta to wash away the last few days of desert dust by swimming in the Pacific. That felt amazing, but the feeling didn't last long, the dust gets everywhere, I'll be finding it for weeks.


We only really got going with sampling in the last few days due to all of the digging and re-planning required first. Because I am interested in the organic molecules present in the sediments at minute amounts and others are interests in rare microbes, all of the sampling had to be carried out in as clean and sterile a way as possible. This is obviously not easy in the desert, especially when the afternoon winds pick up and you end up running 500 m after your face mask as it disappears into the distance... This was slow going and we were maybe not quite as productive as we had hoped. However, we sampled many interesting sediments which should have a good story to tell.

'Sterile' sampling

I nearly didn't have any samples to bring back at all. After checking my bags and making my way through security in Antagofasta airport I ('Samwell Roy-lay') was called back through security and taken into the back room by a serious looking security guy. The suspicious looking 'powders' wrapped in aluminium foil had unsurprisingly got security excited.

This is it, I thought, the latex gloves are going on....

Thankfully, we'd anticipated this and got a letter, explaining what the samples are and why I really don't want to open them in a dirty airport, translated into Spanish (thanks to the magic of Twitter), printed on official looking Imperial College London headed paper, signed and rubber stamped. This literally saved my ass.

While that is an experience I wouldn't want to repeat, working in the desert was an amazing experience. The geology is like nothing I'd ever seen before and I have a new understanding of how the subsurface may be in the hyper-arid Martian environment. It was great to be finally back in the field after so long stuck in the lab and offroading pickup trucks, sleeping under the stars and sitting late around the campfire with a great bunch of people was pretty awesome too.

Camp under the stars

Maybe they'll let me go back when I've worked my way through this bunch of samples, best get cracking...

Sunday, 24 December 2017

Latest paper summary: Effect of Hydration State of Martian Perchlorate Salts on Their Decomposition Temperatures

Here’s an early Christmas present for everyone (so both of you who read this blog), our latest paper (my first out of this project) is now published online and completely open access for anyone to read.

If you can’t be bothered to read it, here is a summary:

Since the Viking landers back in 1976, numerous missions have gone to Mars and attempted to find organic matter on the surface. However, to this date, none have succeeded in finding anything other than simple chlorinated hydrocarbons. We expect there to be a detectable amount of relatively complex organic molecules in the Martian near surface from meteoritic input (meteorites are full of organic matter), hydrothermal processes and maybe even left behind as evidence of extinct (or, unlikely but not impossible, extant) life. This lack of detectable organics was always a bit of a mystery…

Note: the presence of organic matter does not necessarily mean the existence of life, organic molecules are just those which have carbon and hydrogen and they can be formed by numerous non-biological processes – including in deep space.

However, since they were accidentally discovered by the Phoenix mission back in 2008 we’ve known that that there are these salts on Mars called perchlorates. These salts are very rare on Earth, only being known to exist in significant quantities in the Atacama Desert and the Antarctic Dry Valleys; two of the driest places on Earth.  As the name suggests perchlorates have 4 oxygens to each chlorine ion and so are very highly oxidising. While (relatively) stable on the Martian surface, as soon as these are heated within the sample analysis oven of a Martian lander or rover these literally explode, giving off loads of oxygen into the analytical system (which should be a vacuum). This means that any organic matter which may be in the Martian soil is combusted, reacting with the oxygen present and breaking down to carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide,  and the few surviving scraps are heavily broken up and react with the chlorine in the perchlorate, making small chlorinated hydrocarbons. Because of this destruction the molecules we are interested in cannot be detected – This is the perchlorate problem.

My attempt to summarise the Perchlorate Problem on the Sketch Your Science wall at AGU this year

My job as a postdoc researcher at Imperial College is to attempt to find a way around this ‘perchlorate problem’ by researching how these perchlorates (and other similar minerals) react with organic matter. The first step of this, however, is to try to understand a little more about the Martian perchlorates themselves. And this is what this recently published body of work was concerned with.

Since it landed on the Mars in 2012 the Curiosity Rover has drilled 15 holes into the Martian surface and analysed the drilled sample to see what it is made of. One of the techniques used is looking at the gases given off by the sample when it is heated. However, every time the Curiosity Rover has analysed one of these sample holes, the temperature that oxygen gas is released from the sample is very different (Sutter et al., 2016). Most of the oxygen given off is believed to have come from these perchlorates (based on other gases given off at the same time). It has been found by previous laboratory experiments that different types of perchlorate salts (magnesium perchlorate, iron perchlorate, calcium perchlorate, etc) break down and give off oxygen at different temperatures (Glavin et al., 2015), and also break down at different temperatures depending on whether other minerals which may act as catalysts are also present in the soil (Sutter et al., 2014). Therefore it has so far been concluded that different types of perchlorates and/or catalyst minerals have been present at each drill site.

Curiosity on Mars (credit: NASA)
The first 14 drill holes Curiosity drilled on Mars (credit: NASA)

This is a bit problematic. It is believed that most perchlorate forms in the Martian atmosphere and falls out onto the surface (as it does on Earth) and so there is no known mechanism for having different perchlorates in different places – they should all be pretty much the same across the Martian surface.

It is known that perchlorates are highly hydrophilic – they will suck up any water available (they are used as drying agents in industry) and can change their hydration state (how many molecules of water are bound to each molecule of perchlorate) really easily. The temperature and humidity of the Martian surface changes massively throughout the Martian day and year. Photographs taken on Mars by Phoenix show growing blobs on the lander struts which have been interpreted as perchlorate goos as they absorb water throughout the Martian day. So, my boss, Mark Sephton, had an idea that the hydration state of the perchlorates may actually have an important effect on their breakdown temperature and set me to investigate this.

'Blobs' of perchlorate 'goo' moving across the struts of the Phoenix lander (Renno et al., 2009)

I did this by taking a single one of the perchlorate salts (magnesium perchlorate) and drying it out in the glassware drying oven to drive off water in an attempt to reduce its hydration state. After three weeks I removed some sample, flash heated it and analysed the gases given off using pyrolysis-GCMS at 100 °C temperature steps from 200-1000 °C to create oxygen (and other lesser gases) release-temperature profiles. A sample of the perchlorate was also left out on the lab bench to rehydrate and analysed in the same way after 24, 48 and 72 hours of exposure and rehydration. This whole experiment was repeated after another week and then after a fortnight so oxygen release profiles were created for 3, 4 and 5 week drying times and corresponding 24, 48 and 72 hour re-exposure samples.

It was confirmed that these drying and re-exposure experiments were definitely changing the hydration states of the perchlorates by testing them (by X-ray diffraction) next door in the Natural History Museum. This involved transporting them through crowds of tourists under an inert atmosphere (in a sealed lunchbox filled with nitrogen gas) to prevent further hydration state change.

What we found was that different hydration states did indeed affect the temperature of decomposition so that the oxygen release profiles were as different for different hydration states of this one kind of perchlorate as the previous studies had found for all the different kinds they tested. This, therefore, gave a much simpler answer to this puzzle: Curiosity has been analysing different samples with different hydration states of perchlorate in them. This makes sense as the different samples drilled have been analysed at different times of the Martian day and year and samples spend varying amounts of time stashed inside the temperature-controlled innards of the rover before they get round to being analysed – which could allow further changes in their hydration state. Our data show that is it possible for numerous hydration states of perchlorate to exist within a sample and this leads to multiple peaks in the oxygen release profile, some of the Martian samples have multiple peaks in their oxygen release profile and so we suggest that this is due to unstable mixtures of perchlorate hydration states being present on the Martian surface.

This figure from the paper shows how the data from this study (A) compares to select samples analysed on Mars by Curiosity (B) and various types of perchlorate from a study by Glavin et al. (2015) (C). It can clearly be seen that the variation in the samples of magnesium perchlorate that were dried out for various numbers of weeks and analysed in this study is almost as great as the variation in different perchlorates from the Glavin et al. study. So, different hydration states may offer a simpler explanation for the variation seen in the Martian samples. 
We tried to see if the oxygen release profile of the Martian samples (and therefore, based on our findings, the perchlorate hydration state) corresponded to the climate conditions at the time they were sampled at but did not find any relationship. There did seem, however, to be a vague suggestion in the data that they were related to the time of the year that they were sampled at, although more data would be needed to be sure about this.

All in all, we conclude that the hydration state of perchlorate salts is yet another thing to make making sense of Martian data yet more complicated.

Monday, 18 December 2017

Science, Sazerac and Steamers: AGU 17, New Orleans

After a heavy night with a few of the ex-UEA mountaineering club members visiting us in The London it was an unpleasant early morning trudge to the tube station nursing a hangover. With perfect timing it just so happened that I was flying out on the one day that Hell (sorry, London, nope, right the first time) froze over. Heavy snow meant minor panic, as all public transport was buggered and it started to look as though a tube might not turn up at all. Thankfully it did and it turned out that there was no worry of missing my flight as it ended up delayed for 3 hours. There was only one de-icing truck available and it was snowing so heavily that once they’d defrosted one side of the plane the previous side had re-frozen up and needed doing again….This, of course, meant I missed my connecting flight which took off 5 minutes before I landed in Atlanta. Luckily, avoiding a repeat of last time this happened to me, they managed to get me the last seat on the last plane to New Orleans that evening. Although, from the sound of things, plenty were not so lucky, airports around the west coast of the US must have been full of stressed out scientists snuggling up to their poster tubes that night.

AGU was intense, having been to EGU (the European version in Vienna) during my PhD and thinking that was pretty big, I was expecting something of a similar scale. I was wrong, it was unfathomably massive. There were over 25,000 geoscientists in attendance and over 20,000 talks and posters to see….that is a fuck ton of exciting new scientific research being shared. The conference centre was over a kilometre long, it took over 20 minutes to get from one end to the other with all the crowds; thankfully all the Planetary Science talks were clustered together so I didn’t have to run about much – although still managed to average about 15,000 steps a day just getting about!

Due to the sheer number of coevally running sessions it was not possible to see everything I had an interest in (if you’ve read this blog before you may have noticed I get involved in an eclectic mix of sciences) so I stuck with the Planetary Science sessions as that’s what I work with at the moment. Running between talks on Martian surface processes and outer solar system geochemistry – my main 2 things at the moment. There was some exciting results being presented from all the current missions that are on the go at the minute – especially from Mars Curiosity and the recently deceased Cassini probe, so lots of cool space pictures.
Bourbon Street in the French Quarter

I was there to present a poster on our latest paper on the effects of hydration state on Martian perchlorate salts, about which a summary blog post will be coming soon once the open access version of the article is out (you can read the pre-proofed version of the article here, although it is temporarily pay walled). Unfortunately, despite good intentions of being well rested and fresh for the 8am session, the night before got pretty heavy. It is apparently impossible to have a quiet drink in New Orleans and we ended up in a bar with a pretty cool band drinking Sazeracs (the local speciality cocktail, laced with absinthe) with random other scientists until the early hours. This was partly because my mate fancied the band’s singer (oh, shit, I was supposed to never mention that again) but also because this is what happened EVERY SINGLE NIGHT.

Bourbon Street at night, watching people 'get got'
As it turns out, an AGU poster session is not the place to be with an absinthe-derived hangover, they are intense AF. What was cool was that everyone was super positive about the results and I now have a few things to try in the lab for future work that have come out of the chats we had. The argument I was sort of expecting with the research group whose work our work is directly contradicting never came, which I guess is good as it would probably have ended with me spewing up on a senior NASA scientists shoes… I did have a minor fan-girly moment when one of the old professors who’s big on the Curiosity Rover team came up to collect a copy of our paper though.

New Orleans is a great locality for a conference, as somebody who hates being in cities, this is definitely one of the best I’ve been to. Every evening was spent exploring the French Quarter or the Riverside area, hanging out in ridiculously cool bars listening to spectacular live music – lots of Jazz – and drinking great local craft ales and Sazerac. The food was also amazing, blackened fish, shrimp, deep fried catfish and crawdads, so good, although I didn’t get round to trying any ‘gator.

Apparently everything that lives in the river/gulf can and will be deep fried

 While really cool, the area does have quite the seedy side and there were plenty of con-artists out trying to swindle tourists – they must have seen the conference attendees from a mile off, us scientists are not known for our street-smarts. The popular scam is offering a shoe shine then betting the tourist they can tell them exactly where, on what street in which city they got their shoes. The scam answer being ‘On the bottom of yo’ feet, in this street’ and then getting all up in their face and calling over their mates if they don’t hand over the ‘Ten for the shine, and ten for the line’. Must’ve made a killing this week based on the number of guys getting got we spotted while sat up on a balcony overlooking Bourbon Street. Also, someone had altered a pedestrian roadworks diversion to funnel you into a grotty looking strip club, we noticed we were being herded just in time to avoid this one, sneaky bastards.

 On Wednesday afternoon we skipped out the conference to do some touristy stuff. The choice was an airboat swamp tour or a paddle steamer jazz cruise. Sadly at this time of year the alligators would’ve all been hibernating at the bottom of the swamp, so we opted for the steamer. Best. Idea. Ever. Cruising down the Mighty Mississippi, seeing the sights, learning a bit of history from the captain (who had the Louisiana accent ever), listening to jazz and chilling with a few beers was clearly the highlight of the week.

Steaming down the Mississippi
All in, it was an amazing week; exciting science and great times, I wonder if Washington will be able to compare next year? Somehow I doubt it…

Tuesday, 28 November 2017

Adventures in Peer Review or There and Back and Again and Again and Again

So my latest paper (and my first on Martian geochemistry rather than corals) is now online at JGR: Planets in its pre-proof form. I’ll be posting an easy to understand summary of the science once the finalised article is up in all of its open access glory but for now, so not to anger our publisher overlords with potential copyright violations, here is the saga of this paper’s epic journey through the peer-review process. I'm posting this story as it feels very disparaging getting your submissions that you've worked hard on knocked back, and I think it's good to know that behind many successful publications there is a back story of rejection and so a light at the end of the tunnel.

The work for this paper was one of the first projects I carried out here at Imperial; investigating the relationship between the hydration state of perchlorate salts and the temperature they decompose at. This is an important issue as it is believed that the thermal decomposition of these salts when heated during analysis of Martian soil may be confounding our attempts to detect organic matter on Mars – but more on that next time.

This work was completed, written up and initially submitted to a well-known geophysical research journal back in October last year (2016). Unfortunately despite our research group having published similar themes in their before it was rejected by the editor for being ‘too specialist’. Not to be beaten, the manuscript was quickly reworked to another geochemical journal’s format and resubmitted. However, they thought it was ‘better for consideration for another journal’. It seemed salts on Mars weren’t in vogue at the moment – all the cool geo-astro-bio-chemists-or-whatver-the-hell-I-am-now are researching Enceladus now…

After another round of reformatting (thank fuck for Mendeley and its instantaneous citation-style-reformatting) and re-registering into another publisher’s online submission machine we submitted to a more specialist (think space-chemistry not bondage) journal in November (2016). Thankfully, this time there was no instantaneous letter of rejection from the editor as the manuscript was sent out for peer review.

To those who don't know, all legitimate scientific work has to be checked over by other experts in the field before it can be released into the wider scientific community. This is the peer-review process and it keeps the amount of bad science out there down to a minimum - or at least it did until you could say whatever you wanted on the internet and people would lap it up and tinfoil hat wearing nutters started having their own journal and conferences.

We received two reviews of the paper at the beginning of February 2017, both reviewers reasonably wanted proof that the perchlorates I was experimenting on were indeed changing their crystal structure when dehydrated, as I hypothesised, rather than just losing superficial water. They requested, therefore, that we carried out additional tests on the samples to prove this – by X-Ray Diffraction (XRD). This was fair enough, it would make our argument much stronger.

Unfortunately we do not have our own XRD machine in the lab, they’re pretty big, specialist expensive pieces of kit. Also, all of the samples that I had used had spent much longer either in the drying oven or exposed to the laboratory atmosphere than they had when I analysed them, this meant the whole month-and-a-half drying and subsequent re-exposure experiments had to be repeated on fresh perchlorate. So, I booked time on the XRD machine next door at the Natural History Museum and put the samples in the oven for 6 weeks at about gas mark 0.25. The flip side to this was that I got to go behind-the-scenes at the Natural History Museum which is always cool – getting a security pass, jumping the queues (it was half term) and getting let through the mysterious door hidden behind the giant sloth skeleton, going from the mad noisy crowds to the peace and quiet of the underground laboratories. However, repeatedly running from our lab, through the crowds of tourists on Exhibition Road carrying a lunchbox filled with nitrogen gas to preserve my sample was interesting to say the least.

The guardian of the secret science caves (Image credit)

While the truth was somewhat more complicated than we had expected, the XRD data did indeed prove that the conditions we were subjecting the samples to was enough to change their hydration state. Bolstering our conclusions that it was changes in hydration state that were affecting the breakdown temperature. The manuscript was updated to include these findings (along with making many more minor changes suggested by the reviewers) and sent back to review at the end of March.

Just over a month later the second round of reviews came back, this time they didn’t agree. 

Reviewer One’s was basically,

Ah, I see you did as I asked and it proved your point, nice work, this should be published 😊’

Reviewer Two on the other hand,

Ah, I see you did as I asked, I still don’t believe it, I think my idea is the best, REJECTION 

Unfortunately for us, although probably good for scientific integrity, the Editor has to go with the harshest review and the paper was rejected by the journal. I thought in this case, however, that this was unfair, after the amount of work I’d put in to, fulfill everything this reviewer had asked for. As there was such disparity between the two reviews, it felt like they had an axe to grind, maybe they were one of the many that this work was disagreeing with and didn't like that. Unfortunately, from talking to people, this seems to happen a lot during the peer-review process, which isn’t cool, if the work is solid, but doesn't agree with your ideas, then it’s up to you to prove its wrong with your own research later, not block it from coming out, that’s how science progresses.

So I sent a whiny letter to the editor, telling on Reviewer Two for being mean. Surprisingly this worked and the editor promised to send the paper out to new reviewers IF we made a few concessions and elaborated on why we didn’t think the alternative hypothesis Reviewer Two washing pushing was correct.

After some improvements we re-re-submitted at the end of June, a tense few months followed as we waited to hear what the new reviewers thought of our work – would they be kind? Thankfully both reviews we received at the beginning of November were very positive and it only took a few days to put right the points they made – which were mostly just things needing re-wording to make more sense/be less ambiguous, or typos that had somehow made it this far unspotted.

Finally on the 16 November 2017, almost exactly a year after the first submission, the paper was accepted. The battle was over, we had won, now to wait and see what the wider community thinks…

Friday, 15 September 2017

Why Cassini had to Die

This morning, the 15th September, after 20 years in space, Cassini ended her mission exploring the Jovian and Saturnian systems, intentionally vapourising itself by crashing into the atmosphere of Saturn. Due to the huge distance they had to be relayed, signals of the data collected right up until the moment of destruction took several hours to reach Earth.

Artistic visualisation of Cassini starting her final plunge towards Saturn (Credit: NASA)

The death of Cassini was of utmost importance for the Planetary Protection of the outer solar system (see The more Cassini’s observations have taught us about the icy moons of Saturn and Jupiter, the more we have realised just how complex, interesting and important these extraterrestrial worlds are.

Enceladus, Europa and Ganymede are all now known to contain vast internal water oceans under a protective icy shell, Titan has a complex atmosphere full of organic molecules and lakes of hydrocarbons on its surface. There is a chance that these environments may harbour life or at least have complex systems of pre-biotic chemistry. In this respect Cassini created more questions than it answered, creating massive interest in further exploration of these bodies, with specific life detection missions.

Cassini discovered Enceladus has a subsurface ocean and water vapour plumes which contain organic matter and evidence of water-rock interactions - the building blocks and  a potential energy source for life (Credit: NASA)

Cassini saw through Titan's thick hazy atmosphere to discover  a hugely complex world with hydrocarbon lakes, methane rain and active geology (Credit: NASA)

In order for future missions to study these questions, we must not contaminate these bodies with terrestrial microbes or organic contaminants which may accidentally be detected and mistaken for indigenous alien life. This is where planetary protection comes in. Cassini was dirty, not having undergone strict contamination control cleaning procedures and so will have been carrying an unfortunate payload of microbes and organic molecules. If Cassini had been allowed to continue its orbit around Saturn unchecked, its orbit could have decayed over time leading to a crash landing on one of the moons which may have led to uncontainable and irreversible contamination.

Cassini’s fiery death therefore saves the pristine conditions on these fascinating moons for future generations of scientists to explore. 

Goodbye Cassini and thankyou

Artistic visualisation of the Cassini's final moments burning up in Saturn's atmosphere (Credit: NASA)

Wednesday, 23 August 2017

3 Days, 3 Rock Types and 100 Million Years: Climbing in Devon

This (extended) weekend just gone, Dan, one of our regular ex-Norwich climbing partners, took us on a climbing tour of his home crags in Devon. This was an excuse for me to look at some nice rocks and we managed to get on three different rock types, covering over 100 million years of the geological history of the UK, over the three days.

Simplified geological map of Devon showing the three locations (adapted from Kirkwood et al., 2016)

Day 1: Baggy Point - Sandstone

Saturday, starting off at Baggy Point near Croyde. The climbing here is on the 360-370 million year old, Upper Devonian Baggy Sandstone Formation. They overlie the Upcott Slates and are themselves overlain by the Pilton Mudstones, all together a making up a 450m thick succession of interbedded sands, silts, muds and thin limestones charting a changing river delta succession which at first built outwards as sea level fell and then retreated inland as sea level rose again.

Due to their age and the pressures and temperatures they have been subjected to these sandstones are slightly metamorphosed and so are much harder than more recent sandstone deposits (such as those known to climbers as the Southern Sandstones around Kent) and so are a lot more solid to climb on. Routes (such as the classics Lost Horizon and Shangri-Lai) follow angular fractured cracks up otherwise sheer faces while harder routes tackle the blank slabs themselves, relying on delicate footwork and careful movement with little means of protection.

Rob leading Lost Horizon following a steep crack system

The sheer faces plunging steeply into the sea that characterise the climbing here were originally horizontal as the sedimentary sequence was deposited on the sea bed. However, during the Late Devonian and Carboniferous Periods these rocks felt the distal effects of the mountain building event known as the Variscan Orogeny. The continents of Gondwana and Laurussia collided to form the supercontinent Pangea highly folding and faulting the rocks as they were compressed together. At Baggy Point this tilted the sequence very steeply to bring the ancient sea bed to a near vertical orientation and creating the sheer, almost featureless, delicate slabs which are a feature of the climbing here.

Dan leading while I belay on the second pitch of a route up one of the steeply dipping slabs at Baggy Point (credit: C. Wade)

Unfortunately due to the interbedded weaker muds and the highly erosive sea cliff environment a lot of the rock here is quite fragile and we pulled a few dangerous chunks off into the sea as we climbed.

Day 2: Daddyhole - Limestone

Sunday, now we’re climbing a little further back in time to the mid-Devonian at the cliffs of Daddyhole in Torquay. This is very close to the Devonian type section at Torbay (which I have written about before as part of the UEA Slapton fieldtrip). The plan was to climb on the lower part of the sequence at Daddyhole Main Cliff, however, due to the long commiting nature of the routes down there and the incoming rain we were forced to visit the uppermost part of the sequence instead at Daddyhole Upper.

The mid-Devonian Limestones here were deposited around 400 million years ago when the UK was located within the tropics and Devon was beneath a warm, shallow, tropical sea. The limestones here represent a sequence from a thriving offshore reef system, well away from any polluting terrestrial input, with corals, sponges, shellfish and other organisms being highly abundant in the fossil record. Overtime (up the sequence/cliff face) the limestone becomes ‘dirtier’ as more sand and mud reaches the area from the nearby landmass and the reef life is gradually choked out, a process helped by nearby volcanoes occasionally burying the reef in ash deposits.

Spot the Dan, he's pretty much at the boundary between the cleaner massively bedded limestones and the siltier, finer bedded sequence above

The impurity of the limestone and interbedded siltier layers mean that the climbing at Daddyhole Upper is somewhat ‘esoteric’ with plenty of loose, crumbly rock and so it is not the most popular venue. This does however mean it has not taken on the smooth mirror-polished quality of more popular limestone crags (such as much of the climbing in Portland or Cheddar) and the combination of weathered out juggy limestone cracks and grippy rock is a rare delight (as long as you don’t think about how sketchy all the gear placements are. Unfortunately rain quickly stopped play here and we only got a single route in before retreating for a seaside Devonshire cream tea.

Charlotte's favourite type of climbing

Day 3: Dartmoor - Granite

Monday and its back to the future on the granite of Dartmoor. This is part of the massive Cornubian Batholith (batholith = large body of magma) that welled up underneath the southwest of England around 300-275 million years ago, during the Late Carboniferous-Early Permian. This outcrops at various localities all the way from the Isles of Scilly to Dartmoor, but is known (from a low density gravity anomaly) to extend more than 100 km further southwest under the sea.

The formation of this huge body of molten rock is related to the same mountain building event as the folding of the Devonian sediments (that we climbed on the previous two days) it intruded into. Partial melting of the lower crust occurred at a late stage during the mountain building process (after the majority of the folding had already occurred) and extension of the crust allowed the batholith to rise irregularly as ‘blobs’ to higher levels.

Over time, the softer sedimentary rocks that were intruded into have preferentially eroded away, leaving behind these granite ‘blobs’ exposed as Tors on areas such as Dartmoor. As the overlying rocks were removed the granite was unloaded and expanded, fracturing both horizontally and vertically and peeling itself apart. This produced the horizontal breaks, vertical cracks and juggy flake systems that characterise climbing on the Tors of Dartmoor.

Dan wedging himself in a nice big crack, note the horizontal joints too (credit C. Wade)

Large, sharp phenocrysts (big crystals) of plagioclase stand out proud from the otherwise surprisingly smooth and slippery blank sections of granite face. These tell the geologist that the granite cooled in stages, the big crystals grew slowly at depth before the magma rose upwards to shallower, cooler levels and finished solidifying quicker so the rest of the crystals (the groundmass) are much smaller. For the climber, delicate, precise footwork or desperate crimping and hauling with the fingertips on these small protrusions is often the only way to make progress on the harder routes. The sharpness of these crystals tears into the skin restricting the number of attempts you can have at a hard move before bloody fingers stop play, but gives excellent friction allowing your climbing shoes to stick to the smallest nubbin.

Me climbing Vandal & Ann, run out and sketched out trying to figure out the best way of using a series of crappy little crystals to get to the safety of the next big break (credit C. Wade)

Clearly in three days it is only possible to scratch the surface of the number of different rock types and climbing venues available in the southwest and we will return soon to sample more of their esoteric delights. Although it’s back onto my favourite Peak Grit for the upcoming bank holiday weekend.